Why You're Not Getting Interviews (Even If You're Qualified), And How To Fix It

You’ve applied to dozens of jobs, double-checked your qualifications.

You've heard nothing other than what seems like an auto-rejection.

You aren’t alone. Job seekers say: ❝The rejection comes too fast—it has to be automated. I’m qualified. So what am I doing wrong?❞

Employers insist: ❝I’ve used every major ATS. None of them auto-reject resumes. Not even at the biggest companies.❞

So, what gives?

Let’s unpack what’s actually happening—why your resume might never be seen, how to fix it, and what you can do to get more interviews with less frustration. This is compiled from 20 years of personal experience in HR Tech, with quotes from recruiters and hiring managers.

1. You Got Knocked Out Before Anyone Saw Your Resume

Most companies use “knockout” questions during the application process. One “wrong” answer, and you don’t meet their qualifications.

Common questions:

     “Do you need sponsorship?” (Yes = rejection)

     “What’s your location?” (Too far = rejection)

     “Expected salary?” (Too high = rejection)

Some ATS pre-fill various answers for you after parsing your resume as a time-saver. Make sure all of these details are correct. If you are applying to a job in Dallas, but your location says Fort Worth, you may unnecessarily be sent the rejection pile. Why? One example - some employers only hire within 15 miles of the office for in-person or hybrid roles.

2. Your Resume Is Missing Keywords, Key Experience and Skills

You might be qualified—but your resume has to prove it.

Recruiters use keyword searches to find top applicants. If your resume doesn’t include the exact terms they are looking for, you might not show up at all.

❝We have a few seconds to scan each resume. If we don’t see the right keywords, we move on.❞

They are looking to see if you have done this job before and how great were you at the job. Don’t make them guess.

Here’s where it can be tricky sometimes: Even highly-qualified candidates get filtered out because their resume didn’t spell things out. HR doesn’t necessarily understand all the intricacies of every role they are responsible for. That's not their job. They might take requirements from the person or team leading tech or finance, for example, and create job postings out of that. This creates a black and white scenario without much room for gray area.

Examples:

👉 You’ve used Microsoft Azure AD, but they ask for EntraID. It’s the same thing rebranded—but unless you list EntraID, HR might think you aren’t qualified.

👉 My wife, a DNP-FNP (Doctor of Nursing Practice – Family Medicine), once got rejected from a Family Nurse Practitioner role for being underqualified. Why? The recruiter didn’t recognize the acronym for her degree. Once she spelled out that she was a “Family Nurse Practitioner”, she landed the next role.

Each job has unique qualifications. You need to tailor your resume and application for each one. If you have the qualifications, SPELL IT OUT.

3. Your Content Isn’t Selling Your Potential

This isn’t about keyword stuffing. Yes, your resume needs to include the right keywords, but they need to be in the proper context.

Demonstrate you understand what they are looking for, which are the key hard skills, soft skills, experience, education, and keywords they use. Then show ‘how’ you used that skill or demonstrated that experience in an impressive and natural way.

Strong bullets should answer:

✅ What did you do?

✅ How did you do it? (Tools, methods)

✅ Why did it matter? (Results, impact)

Add names of programs, software, and systems. Was anything measured in $ values, time saved, performance gained, or number of people impacted?

If you are a student, you can highlight course work, volunteer experience, or projects where you demonstrated what the employer wants.

4. You Applied Too Late

‍Okay, so you answered all knockout questions perfectly, used all the right keywords, your value is exceptionally demonstrated, and you still didn’t get an interview.

Just because you applied doesn't mean you'll be considered. That’s not how ATS work.

❝The ATS sorts people based on the order they applied, and if you are applicant #202 but the hiring team found enough qualified people by applicant #105, your application might not even be reviewed.❞

Most hiring teams still manually review all of the applications. That could be hundreds, or thousands. Because it's is such a manual, time-consuming process, they start with the first applicants and only go as far as they need to in order to put a qualified shortlist together.

You might be the most qualified person in the entire pool and you won’t even be seen if you applied too late. Crazy, right?

As other recruiters put it: ❝The default setting is to store applicants in order from the time someone applies so that recruiters can search and review. Most don’t have smart filtering. It’s coming, but it’s not here.❞

💡 Tips:

Apply as early as possible by setting alerts on LinkedIn, Google, and company career sites
On LinkedIn, search jobs by “Past 24 hours” and tweak the URL by changing TPR=r86400 to TPR=r3600 to show only jobs posted in the last hour

Your resume content will get you to an interview, but being one of the early applicants will give you the chance of being considered.

5. It Was a Ghost Job

I hate this one. But not every job posting means there's a real opening.

Two common reasons:

1. They already have an internal candidate but have to post the job publicly.

Even recruiters hate this:
❝My company does this all the time. Everyone goes through the motions knowing full well that "John" will be getting the job. It wastes everyone's time and we all hate it but we have to do it.❞

2. They’re not hiring…yet.

Especially after layoffs, companies stockpile applicants for future openings. They’ll sit on qualified people to stay in the pipeline in case they get the green light to hire. When they do, they need to be able to bring people in quickly, before their competitors do. And due to the reasons above, it’s too time-constraining and labor intensive to start from the beginning. So they might make candidates wait in the process.

6. Your Resume Format Is Hurting You

‍When a recruiter scans your resume, it needs to follow a simple pattern they are used to so they can easily locate key details to understand your qualifications. Anything that prevents this process from happening efficiently may leave you in the ‘no’ pile.

‍
Some ATS parse (scan and store) your resume details in part to auto-fill some of the fields for you. If you have poor formatting that prevents this process from happening correctly, your details might be lost or in the very least populated incorrectly. Two or three column resumes are notorious for being difficult to scan correctly, which can prevent key details from being found in relevant searches within the ATS.

💡 Tips:

Stick to single-column layouts
Use plain fonts and standard headings
No tables, charts, icons, or design flourishes unless you’re in a creative field

❝A good resume should read like Cliff’s Notes: clear, basic, easy to read and retain. The flashier your resume, the worse your chances.❞

7. You’re Using AI the Wrong Way

Asking ChatGPT to “write my resume” is a mistake. Why?

   ❌ You’ll sound like other applicants doing the same thing

   ❌ You risk fabricated details

   ❌ You lose your voice

Use AI to:

   ✅ Give you ideas as a jumping off point for writing

   ✅ Research a company or role

   ✅ Refine and shorten your language

AI should polish your story, not replace it.

If your writing shows the tell-tale signs of AI, recruiters might not trust that who you are on paper is who will show up to the interview. If there is any doubt, they may move forward with other candidates.

8. The ATS Isn’t as Smart as You Think

Despite rumors, most ATS aren’t powered by AI. Nor is AI auto-rejecting candidates. In reality, ATS are closer to filing cabinets with basic search capabilities.

❝MANY ATS score resumes. The scoring is terrible, and most of the Recruiters I know ignore them, but it is a thing. I've used most of the big ones, Workday, Salesforce, iCIMS, Greenhouse, Jazz, Paycom, Beamery, ADP, and they are generally speaking all pretty bad. So we manually review applicants.❞
‍

Features, like knockout questions and keyword filters, are set by humans. Recruiters search these systems and browse candidates in the order they applied. And humans make hiring decisions.
‍

❝We are bound by compliance and are audited that no hiring decisions are being made by anything but a person. I look at every single resume that applies to every one of my jobs, and disposition every candidate swiftly if we’re moving forward or not. I work directly for a Fortune 500 company that has 12 business units.❞

Bottom line: If ATS were smarter, all applicants would be seen and considered. Instead, we are left for job seekers to compete in a crowded, broken system.

Let’s Put It All Together:

To 10X your chances of getting hired:

Tailor your resume to include all relevant keywords and experience with a natural voice
Demonstrate how you have the hard and soft skills they request
Use a simple resume template with outstanding content that is easy to skim
Apply early